Assignation methods between routing groups

Routing rules are flexible and personalised. They enable you to accurately define how and to which respondent your conversations should be distributed via the assignation methods.

Here are the 3 assignation methods available within our platform:

1. Assignation in escalation

Overflow occurs depending on the occupation of the selected routing groups and the order defined by the administrator. 
 
Here's how to distribute conversations in escalation between 3 routing groups which will be A > B > C: 
When the threshold for conversation queues is set to 0 :
You only engage visitors if your agents are available to receive conversations in real-time.
For a conversation to be distributed to routing group B, agents from routing group A must have either reached their maximum occupancy, or be offline, or be unavailable
For routing group C to receive a conversation, routing groups A and B must have either reached their maximum occupancy, or be offline, or be unavailable
When the threshold for conversation queues is superior to 0 :
You engage visitors even if your agents are not available to receive conversations in real-time.
For a conversation to be distributed to routing group B, the routing group A's conversation queue must be full
Here is an example with the following configuration:
  • global conversation queue threshold set to 100
  • Routing group A's threshold set to 50
  • Routing group B's threshold set to 30
  • Routing group C's threshold set to 20

Conversations will first arrive in routing group A's conversation queue. If group A's conversation queue is full (full when reaching 50 conversations), new conversations will arrive in group B's queue, and so on.

When all the conversation queues of each group associated with your routing rule are full, i.e. the number of 100 pending conversations has been reached, then no more visitors will be engaged.

 
NB : It is not recommended to choose the cascade distribution method for conversations with third party channels (WhatsApp, Facebook, Apple...), as the availability of the groups is not checked and the conversations are by default queued to the first distribution group (here A). Prefer the custom distribution rule to make a distribution.
 
 
Capture_d_e_cran_2019-10-16_a__10.46.43.png

2. Equitable assignation

Conversations are equally distributed between several routing groups. 
 
Here's how the process of a fair routing between 3 routing groups A = B = C works : 
When the threshold for conversation queues is set to 0 : 
You only engage visitors if your agents are available to receive conversations in real-time.
For example, if you have defined a threshold of 100 conversations for your routing rule and with 3 routing groups whose distribution is as follows: A:50% B:35% C:15; new conversations will then be distributed in turns to the conversation queues according to the routing system selected.
  • 1 for group A's conversation queue
  • 1 for group A's conversation queue
  • 1 for group A's conversation queue
  • 1 for group B's conversation queue
  • 1 for group B's conversation queue
  • 1 for group C's conversation queue
  • And so on and so on
 When all the conversation queues of each group associated with your routing rule are full, i.e. the number of 100 pending conversations has been reached, then no more visitors will be engaged.
When all the conversation queues of each group associated with your routing rule are full, i.e. the number of 100 pending conversations has been reached, then no more visitors will be engaged.
 
Capture_d_e_cran_2019-10-16_a__10.45.56.png
 
N.B. Whether a conversation queue is set to 0 or not, if a routing group is increasingly lagging behind according to the target percentage, the routing engine favours it in the distribution for the group to catch up (conversations are distributed in priority to the groups furthest from its target percentage).
NB: The counters for the number of conversations distributed per routing group are reset every day at midnight (based on the project timezone). This is valid for both fair and personalized distribution.

3. Personalised assignation 

Conversations are distributed between several routing groups according to a ratio per agent defined by the administrator. 
For a personalised routing defined between 3 routing groups A, B, C: 
Conversations are distributed in turns to routing groups A, B, and C and then distributed to groups furthest from their target percentage.
When the threshold for conversation queues is set to 0 : 
You only engage visitors if your agents are available to receive conversations in real-time.
When the threshold for conversation queues is superior to 0 :
You engage visitors even if your agents are not available to receive conversations in real-time.
For example, if you have defined a threshold of 100 conversations for your routing rule and with 3 routing groups whose distribution is as follows: A:50% B:35% C:15%; new conversations will then be distributed in turns to the conversation queues according to the routing system selected.
  • 1 for group A's conversation queue
  • 1 for group A's conversation queue
  • 1 for group A's conversation queue
  • 1 for group B's conversation queue
  • 1 for group B's conversation queue
  • 1 for group C's conversation queue
  • And so on and so on

 

Capture_d_e_cran_2019-10-16_a__10.44.37.png
 
 
N.B. Whether a conversation queue is set to 0 or not, if a routing group is increasingly lagging behind according to the target percentage, the routing engine favours it in the distribution for the group to catch up (conversations are distributed in priority to the groups furthest from its target percentage).

How are conversations handled?

When the threshold for conversation queues is set to 0 : 
Agents from each group receive the conversations in real-time when logged in to their conversation panel and available.
When the threshold for conversation queues is superior to 0 :
Agents from each group handle conversations coming from queues when logged in to their conversation panel and available. Whenever they snooze or close a conversation, it frees up a spot in their group's conversation queue, and they receive the next conversation to be handled.

4. Impact of asynchronous on assignation methods

Assignation in escalation

 

If a rule 1 exists with

- Group 1 - 50 places
- Group 2 - 20 places

Conversations will fill the queue in Group 1, before being able to flow into Group 2

 

Equitable  / Custom assignation

 

If a rule 1 exists with

- Group 1 - 50% - 50 places
- Group 2 - 50% - 20 places

Conversations will be allocated according to the 50/50 sliding hour target.

 

 
NB : In our example, for group 1, it is possible to compensate for the equitable distribution that would deprive group 1 of conversations by placing 30 agents in group 1 and 50 in group 2.